Celebrations

[ProKeymaster]

Celebrations

M_Vos – ‘Celebrations’

A year ago I found out about Pro Theory on Youtube and joined this Forum. I’m not really sure what day it was, but it was in August. Time goes fast, another year went by and imo there’s no reason for complaining ( at least not about my personal life, the situation in the world is a bit more disturbing unfortunately ).

So, I just wanted to share that I had a good time on this forum already, that it was nice to get to know the webmaster (Simon) a bit better and I just hope we’ll all have a lot to talk about in the years to come =) Cheers :claphands: :pepsi: :meditate:

Pro – ‘Re: Celebrations’

Great stuff mate!! 😀 I’m really glad you’re still enjoying everything and the theory of it as well :thumbup: I’ve been a bit absent lately, just consolidating myself really, and of course trying to discuss Pro theory with folks. I’m planning to hopefully start some new forums soon, I’m currently in discussion with an old friend on this. :peace:

M_Vos – ‘Re: Celebrations’

Care to tell me something more about those new forums mate? I would love to participate in the discussions if you don’t mind. I’ve been a bit absent as well for the moment, it’s summer and nice weather heh. But the real reason is of course because i’m studying a lot atm =) Which is an enrichment as well in some way.I saw your video reply on YouTube the other day, good to see you keep on defending your statement 🙂 Peace mate, hope to see you soon.

Pro – ‘Re: Celebrations’

Great to hear from you mate!! 🙂 Yes, I’ll tell you a bit about the new forums. Basically I’ve been e-mailing a lot of people about Pro theory, on YouTube and through my other contacts and I’ve got some new papers from China to upload tonight.

I’ve also been talking extensively to my old friend from the old forum (Ramanujan17). He suggested that I submit Pro theory to an online study group [url]www.AIAS.us[/url] so I’m deciding what to write atm. We’ve had a fascinating talk about neutrosophy [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florentin_Smarandache[/url] which I’d never heard of until very recently.

There’s also ‘neutramaths’ or something similar that folks are working on and discussing a little with me too! It’s as though the logic, if you can call it that, within Pro theory is finally being accepted albeit under different names so far. Importantly and excitingly neutrality is at the forefront of these new ideas 😀

It’s all a little early to talk about just yet but my friend suggested that I start some new math forums for neutrosophy and similar cutting edge mathematics which I’m planning to do just as soon as I’ve worked out the details with him.

Hopefully we will get some more mathematically minded members who are also into physics. We’ll just have to wait and see mate :):peace:

M_Vos – ‘Re: Celebrations’

Hey Simon mate! :wave: I’ve read the wiki article on Neutrosophy but I must see it’s explained there without giving much of the details. So until I conduct some further internet research I still have to make wild guesses about what it really is.

However, it has sparked my attention and if you’re planning to make a forum on it I would love to be associated with it (although my input on physics and maths is not so advanced as yours; I do hope you appreciate my thoughts =)

So in short: keep the new ideas coming and keep up the good work; it’s always nice to see one who’s concerned with his projects :thumbup: As for the questionnaire, I don’t really understand for who it’s for, so enlighten me on that one would you 😛

1) Can you give us a brief description of your background and career?As for my religious background: I’m Christian (Rome Catholic) and so is my family. Although I must admit we don’t take religion radically change our way of life. However, we try to maintain some habits connected to Christianity.

I’m a Chemistry student at Ghent University (Belgium) where I’ll be attending my 3rd and final Bachelor year (hopefully, need to take some exams first :p ) before going to the Master years. My goal atm is to become a chemist of course and recently I have been thinking about my fields of interest concerning my specialisation.

After some think work I have decided that nanotechnology is one of the candidates to become my field of expertise, and for the moment I’m trying to update my knowledge on this subject besides my general chemistry knowledge from uni.

2) Why has the Telesio-Galilei Association been formed?I’ll be honest and admit that I’ve never heard of this association before so I can’t give much useful info about it.3) We see standard physics on the TV every day, so how can it be so wrong?

I’m not sure what you mean with wrong; physics gives us a detailed view on many processes in nature and can give good approximations. I find it interesting that documentaries on various topics are at least put into attention to the general public. I believe that some people will have the idea: ‘wow, interesting stuff, let’s find out more about it’.

Which is a good thing since it makes people more aware about scientific progress and how the world works; why some things are complicated when we see it but very good summarized in formulas or theories.

4) What do you consider to be the biggest problems facing humankind today?The whole sociology is at a turning point, lack of moral and discipline becomes a big issue. Try to return a good social equilibrium should be our top priority.

Economics is the second problem; I believe we need to advance with our ideas on money and trade. Unity is maybe the third problem which can only be obtained when the first 2 points are resolved (and not only those points of course). If we want to survive as a species we’ll need united goals to look at.

Anyhow, humanity will always be masters in destruction but with a shift in appreciation towards each other we could accomplish strong unified goals. If unity stays absent we must ask ourselves only one question.

And I hope we’ll never have to do this.5) What is the contribution of science to solve these problems?Personally I think I look at things slightly different because of my scientific knowledge. I know facts and numbers, I know what possibilities there are and I’m open for debate. Sadly, my daily experience shows me that a lot of people don’t share at least part of my way of viewing things. Most of the people don’t want to debate about serious topics, or show interest in scientific topics.

I’m not saying they’re lesser people or that their way of living is incorrect. I’m only trying to point out the idea that science enriches our knowledge, our interests and our way of looking at the world. Everything starts with awareness, for the people and the world around you.

And I believe science can give you that.6) Who do you think is(/are) the greatest physicist(s) of the twentieth century?I believe that’s debatable, because we made a big jump on many fields during the 20st century.

Einstein probably contributed on many fields and put his mark everywhere. Heisenberg, Bohr, Schroedinger, Dirac,… give a great contribution to quantum mechanics.I believe that all contributors to general relativity and quantum mechanics should be rewarded equally since the 20th century is their century.And so will the 21th be the century of a well established TOE 😉

7) What is relativity theory in a nutshell? General relativity and special relativity united, explains us the extreme behaviour near the speed of light and gives a general view on how the universe works on a macro-scale.

8) What is ECE theory in a nutshell? I have to admit that I never heard of it before…

9) What is meant by unification of fields?Unifying the theories of the very small (quantum mechanics) with the theories of the very big ( general relativity).10) Will ECE theory lead to a new model of elementary particles?Sorry, you need to enlighten me on the theory first.

11) How can energy be obtained from space-time without violating conservation of energy? I don’t believe the law of conservation of energy can be broken. So I’m not really sure how to answer this question…

12) What does ECE theory tell us about the universe? I’ll do some research on it and than I can answer it.

Pro – ‘Re: Celebrations’

Almost forgot, here’s a questionnaire for you to fill out mate, it’s just for interest’s sake atm. I got it forwarded to me last night :thumbup:

1) Can you give us a brief description of your background and career?

2) Why has the Telesio-Galilei Association been formed?

3) We see standard physics on the TV every day, so how can it be so wrong?4)

What do you consider to be the biggest problems facing humankind today?

5) What is the contribution of science to solve these problems?

6) Who do you think is(/are) the greatest physicist(s) of the twentieth century?

7) What is relativity theory in a nutshell?

8) What is ECE theory in a nutshell?

9) What is meant by unification of fields?

10) Will ECE theory lead to a new model of elementary particles?

11) How can energy be obtained from space-time without violating conservation of energy?

12)

What does ECE theory tell us about the universe? I sent my immediate thoughts back in the following format, just off the top of my head without thinking it through. I’m still learning who to send this questionnaire to and when or if, I’ll be rewriting my answers of course.

1) Can you give us a brief description of your background and career? I am from a Christian background, my mother teaches the ‘Alpha’ course and my late father was a preacher. I myself follow the Tao Te Ching.

My background is history which I studied to ‘A Level’ standard in England. I applied to Leeds University to do a degree in philosophy but at my interview I presented my TOE and the head of the department felt that after much discussion my thinking was “too unfocused to study a degree at the moment.”

This refers to my TOE (Pro theory) which adds the opposite and neutral potential to anything asked or suggested to it. This looping answer structure is often misinterpreted as a non-committal approach or as unfocused. In answer to this I simply suggest that all things are debatable and that I am fully willing to debate my ideas with anybody.

My main challenge has been on Toequest.com’s forum where I have an account under the name ‘protheory’ and I have challenged many people to prove my TOE wrong or find fault within it publicly.

Please see for yourself what other people said to me and how I responded. I would rather you see my work in person than take my word for it.

2) Why has the Telesio-Galilei Association been formed? The association’s primary aim is to defeat scientific obscurantism and promote scientific truth.

The association secondary aim is to promote scientific debates among the scientific community at large. There are no economic interests, or considerations to the association.

3) We see standard physics on the TV every day, so how can it be so wrong? It can be wrong, right and neutral simultaneously in theory. If you wanted to look at why it’s not as accurate as it could be I suggest that it is because it deals mainly with a singular approach to ‘solving’ problems rather than looking at EVERY possibility.

It too often reduces all things to a right or wrong answer when the reality is that there are three simultaneously possible answers at any one ‘time.’

4) What do you consider to be the biggest problems facing humankind today? Loss of moral structure, nuclear war, pollution and environmental damage.

5) What is the contribution of science to solve these problems? The contribution of science to solving these problems hopefully involves a lot of alternative methods of powering the world, a new and complete model of all universal potentials hopefully removing some of the current and also historical ambiguity surrounding the more ‘ultimate’ questions.

I also hope that science will somehow be able to render nuclear weapons and war itself obsolete although I don’t claim to know specifically how this may occur or when.

6) Who do you think is(/are) the greatest physicist(s) of the twentieth century? I don’t rate any particular physicist over another as I believe that unless they have written an accepted TOE then all of their ideas remain unproven conjecture. If we’re talking of inspirational people in the realm of physics I’d say Einstein is most inspiring although I don’t hold to the majority of his ideas being ‘correct’ as such.

7) What is relativity theory in a nutshell? There are two versions of this theory that attempt to describe the interactions between space, time, and energy, especially for two different objects moving in different ways, or different frames of relative reference.

8) What is ECE theory in a nutshell? ECE stands for Einstein-Cartan-Evans Field Theory. It is a generally covariant unified field theory developed by Myron Evans in 2003.

9) What is meant by unification of fields? Unification of fields means trying to reach an overall principle into which we feed our different ‘fields’ hoping to find a unifying factor between them. The ultimate goal of this is of course a TOE. My own thoughts on this follow: Introduction Four forces were invented to describe all possible interactions between energy and matter within the universe. We must unify them.

Fundamentals 1. The strong force. 2. The weak force. 3. The electromagnetic force. 4. The gravitational force.

1. The strong force. Stability – The strong force is thought to be responsible for the stability of the atomic nucleus. Attractive – It is always attractive and is seen as the binding agent that holds nucleons (protons and neutrons) together. Charges – Like charges are thought to repel each other. Structure – The assumption is that atomic structure could not exist without an internal binding principle.

2. The weak force. Decay – The weak force or interaction affects the atomic nucleus and can also affect the decay of particles and nuclei. Weakness – It is thought to be much weaker than the electromagnetic force and is also thought to act through the exchange of virtual particles. Quarks The weak force is said to cause certain quarks (sub-atomic particles) to decay or break apart.

Overcome – It is assumed that this force builds up within the atomic nucleus until a point when it is sufficient in strength to overcome the strong force. Reversal – The strong force binds and the weak force supposedly reverses the process.

3. The electromagnetic force. Repulsive – The electromagnetic force is thought to be both attractive and repulsive and it is a long range force. Structure – Electromagnetic interaction is responsible for parts of atomic structure, chemical reactions, and all other electromagnetic phenomena such as light.

4. The gravitational force. Quantifiable – The main principle of gravity is that every particle of matter in the known universe attracts every other with a quantifiable force. Attraction – This force is a result of the attraction between two bodies due to the respective mass of each body. Potential – Mass is defined as the amount of potential energy contained in any object, and energy is usually defined as the ability to change from one current observable state to another, or to “do work.”

Always The gravitational interaction is always attractive.

Summary – Do these four forces or interactions exist? Can we unify them and create a theory of everything?

The Problem – The problem is to create a theory that can successfully unify these four forces and explain every possible interaction found within physics.

The Answer – Forces – Any force or interaction of any type may simultaneously exert an attractive force, the opposite and the point between. Truth – This is true regardless of how they may be relatively perceived or described by us. Forces

1. The strong force – The strong interaction can be explained as the opposite to a repulsive force, without considering its neutral potential.

2. The weak force – The weak interaction can be explained as the opposite to an attractive force, without considering its neutral potential.

3. The electromagnetic force – The electromagnetic interaction may be attractive, repulsive, and neutral in its potential.

4. The gravitational force – The gravitational interaction is an attractive force that is observed without considering its opposite (repulsive) and neutral potentials.

Atoms – Atoms are subject to the same three simultaneous potentials as everything else. Atomic Atomic energy may be attractive, repulsive, and neutral. Simultaneously. Singular The singular force that unifies all of these separate interactions is what we call change.

Description Change is a word used to describe something that defies definite and singular description. Opposite – Change is composed of opposite and neutral potentials and may change in three ways simultaneously.

Can we unify the four fundamental forces?

1. We can unify the four fundamental forces and create a theory of everything.

2. We cannot unify the four fundamental forces and create a theory of everything.

3. There is a neutral possibility. Simultaneously.

Am I wrong?

I simultaneously oppose, agree with, and neutralise all criticism ad infinitum. My point is literal. There is no point creating a theory of everything that doesn’t work.

Will ECE theory lead to a new model of elementary particles? Possibly, it really depends on what thoughts it triggers and whether any new such model is accepted/proven. Personally I have my own new model of elementary particles so I’d like more time to learn and compare our different approaches.

11) How can energy be obtained from space-time without violating conservation of energy? Conservation of energy is for starters a singular statement and therefore it is missing or at least not accounting for its opposite and neutral possibilities. Just on this evidence alone I’d say it’s possible to fulfil these criteria.

Going deeper into this, there is also an overlooked ‘third principle’ to energy that provides us with the possibility for a combination approach at some point between the opposites of conservation versus non-conservation.

12) What does ECE theory tell us about the universe? In my opinion it tells us that we’re still not quite there with a true TOE just yet. For it to be a complete TOE in my opinion it must deal fundamentally with three potentials at all times. This way there’s no room for argument as ultimate accuracy is perpetuated like so: I simultaneously oppose, agree with, and neutralise all criticism ad infinitum.

[Author]

Posts