Just an Idea (TOE)

[ProKeymaster]

Just an Idea (TOE)

brian44cali ‘Just an Idea (TOE)’

I’m not really educated on this topic, nor do I really have a full theory, but I do have an idea. I will try to be brief. I did not start my thought process off with Albert Einstein’s theory but I will begin with that to allow for easier understanding.

Albert Einstein stated that matter will bend space. I do not really think matter bends space, but that matter IS a bend in space. Matter is just a complex configuration of energy that is found the the way it is because of its need to be in the most efficient state as possible. In other words all matter is just a complex photon.

The electron we know is just a high pocket of energy(or anti energy) that is given off by the centre of an atom. Protons and neutrons are also complex photons but with a much more stable level and direction of net energy than the electron.

Quarks are only observed shooting out when a particle collides because they are particles with a strong net energy in one certain direction. (Well why the heck would energy stay in an atom state? Just like how atoms have created cells, energy has created atoms. Cells nor atoms don’t seem to be dissipating any time soon.) Everything is just a wave with space as its medium. If space is viewed as a two dimension graph then matter can be seen as deviation in the lines on that graph.

Time moves slower farther away from mass because it does not have to move along the non-straight path that mass creates. An object cannot go the speed of light relative to things around it because space will reach its stretching point. When it goes beyond that stretching point it creates a black hole. There’s some other stuff but that is mostly it. Let the criticism begin…Brian.

Pro – ‘Re: Just an Idea (TOE)’

Well that’s a lot more technical of a description than I was expecting there, great stuff! I’m going to have to read this again a couple of times to take it in but I like your visualisation of atomic energy a lot. I’m quite open to descriptions of energy in the sense that Pro theory is mainly a guideline of three fundamental principles rather than an unchanging statement of concrete description such as those that Einstein and Newton were so fond of.

To be honest I’m not sure whether I personally believe in boundaries and/or limits to space. I like the idea that space reaches its stretching point creating a black hole but I still can’t help but wonder whether things really stretch and whether there really is a limit to anything.To counter this view of mine I’ve decided to offer the idea that if indeed there are limits then these limits are only transitory, I wanted to say temporary here but it’s not the right word for what I’m trying to say.

Pro theory doesn’t hold to any singularities as such, it goes 1, opposite to 1, plus neutral ad infinitum but this leaves us with the problem that we always seem to be going round in circles. If I only write in threes it creates a loop in effect which is not only too ambiguous for most people to accept it’s also confusing.Summing up, I believe that things/energy just change, in three ways simultaneously. To be true to my theory I have to write things like ‘plus the opposite plus neutral’ but I also compromise in daily life.

It’s no good if I’m at work and giving my boss three answers every time he asks if I’ve completed a task.This compromise effectively says by all means use and adhere to singularities such as right and wrong but always remember that in TOE terms there will always be a theoretical opposite and in between point discernible no matter how solid the singular statement may be.

[Author]

Posts