Pro Theory – A Theory of Everything Impressions

[ProKeymaster]

Pro Theory – A Theory of Everything Impressions

Mr Scientist – ‘Re: Pro Theory – A Theory of Everything’

[quote=Pro]This is the new Pro theory topic for now until I get the old posts organised into some kind of FAQ and/or archive. It’s all change around here for now and I’ve spent so long just setting up the code and images etc for this place that I’ve not yet had time to organise things properly.

I’ve always said that a theory of everything should literally be able to handle everything (pun intended) thrown at it, no matter who is throwing what at this idea it has to respond in real time and respond dynamically. It has to change and adapt to each question from each person so that it can benefit the human race and the universe as a whole.

Sorry for the hippyish statement but this is the whole point(s) of Pro theory, to make the world a better place 🙂 There are three things in life, negative, positive and neutral for want of a better description, and without going into too much detail and boring you I think it’s a good idea to learn how our universe really works (changes) and try for once to abandon our misconceptions and really see what it’s all about. All questions about everything are welcome from everyone 🙂 Pro.[/quote]

Let me be a barer of some harsh news. I am a physicist and i have studied many broad theories out there. Some of them are very good, but i tend to feel theories fail conceptually, mathematically and in every way consistently with the inexorable truth that full descriptions of the universe are incomprehensibly difficult to create due to a level of uncertainty.

I found you from a YOUTUBE site [“http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mP6nZsr_vqY\”] YouTube – Theory Of Everything – On Understanding Consciousness and I am about to sit down and see this theory of yours (which seems to involve consciousnsss? I hope this is not going to be a solipsistic-natured theory – they are purely cop-outs based on the theories of consciousness I have studied (which are vast).

First of all, there cannot be any true absolute theory of everything. Do you truely believe that the universe will allow us to reduce its complexities so easily? I’m afraid too many variables and uncertainty exist for any true absolute model with both relativstic and quantum roots. And certainly if such a theory is plausible by even the most enigmatic conditions, the theory of quantum mechanics will undergo many changes yet before such a solution has presented itself. Quantum mechanics is far too premature, and relativity far too incomplete to reconcile all these odds.

[Author]

Posts