Pro Theory – A Theory of Everything

[ProKeymaster]

Pro Theory – A Theory of Everything

Pro – ‘Re: Pro Theory – A Theory of Everything’

So why did I write Pro theory?

Why do I bother to write at all?

Why do I think this is a theory of everything?

The answer is simply that this is the truth. Plain and simple. The truth is that this is the way that the universe works. It’s not complicated or impossible to understand, it’s the simple truth.

I know full well that I’m a very confusing communicator when I type and this doesn’t exactly help me with trying to get this theory understood and accepted by whoever it is that validates theories of everything but I’m just going to keep trying.

I think that current scientific knowledge is too often accepted as unchanging Gospel really. People may think I’m intentionally trying to be controversial here but I’m not. I just found out an idea, thought physicists and philosophers knew about it, and when I realised that they didn’t know about it, I started writing and eventually started making videos.

I’ve just been watching a light hearted biography of Aristotle and this reminded me of when I read a book called ‘The Story Of Philosophy’ a few years ago.

I remember reading all the different philosophies in a linear fashion, forwards through time, Greeks first, the Romans, then Medieval thinkers through the Renaissance thinkers towards the 20th century folks like Karl Popper.As I read each step forward in time seemed more profound than the other and then I realised after writing Pro theory that if I removed the words it was all the same kind of thing.

Each profound philosophy was simply trying to explain what we are and what the world is and how things work.The main thing that always keeps me going strong with my theory is when I read or watch arguments between philosophers and/or physicists. These arguments always seem to come down to one person saying one thing and another person saying the opposite.

This opposite position is after all the root of all argument is it not.I feel more than a little lost at the moment with all this thinking. For a long time I was neutral and I wanted to go into the woods somewhere and think and live on my own. It’s an idea I’ve always dreamed of since I was a child. The idea of there being just me in the woods on my own thinking and living a simple life.

I made a decision a few years after I wrote Pro theory, and this decision was to stay in society. I decided to stay with my family and friends because if I were to remove myself from society completely I’d have the Buddha mind which is always clear and bright but I’d just be neutral.

I wouldn’t have any purpose in my life other than random existence on my own and so I decided to try my best to help other people to understand in the hope that eventually something would happen.This is still what I’m trying to do but I’m pleased to say that over the years I’ve learnt the art of patience. No longer am I desperate to get this theory recognised by the world,

I’m now content to keep trying through what is known as ‘right effort.’ This just means that there is a subtle principle in life that says if you just try in a gentle way you have a good chance of getting what you want which in my case is peace and harmony in some form or another.

It usually takes me a long time to adjust to new things in my life and so I suppose this is why it’s taking me a while to get this forum going and get the topics I’m interested in written etc. I’m just taking it steady and hoping for the best. All I have to do is just keep trying to help people somehow :thumbup:

stevenz – ‘Re: Pro Theory – A Theory of Everything’

I believe a theory of everything will also have to include psychology as well.

Many years ago one of the great psychiatrists ever, Sigmund Freud, said, in his theory of personality, that all behaviour is motivated by two basic forces, Life which he named “libido” and death which he named “thanatos”.

I believe these two forces are definitely related to the fundamental forces of nature because of the theory of the biological theory of “vitalism” which says that biological processes are not separate from the fundamental forces of nature.

Right now we have four fundamental forces if we can break them down to two we will get much closer.thanks. Stevenz.

Pro – ‘Re: Pro Theory – A Theory of Everything’

[quote=stevenz;723]I believe a theory of everything will also have to include psychology as well.

Many years ago one of the great psychiatrists ever, Sigmund Freud, said, in his theory of personality, that all behaviour is motivated by two basic forces, Life which he named “libido” and death which he named “thanatos”.

I believe these two forces are definitely related to the fundamental forces of nature because of the theory of the biological theory of “vitalism”which says that biological processes are not separate from the fundamental forces of nature. Right now we have four fundamental forces if we can break them down to two we will get much closer.thanks,Stevenz[/quote]

I believe this too, Pro theory in order to be a theory of everything must apply to everything, psychology included. By definition, Pro theory is a set of three universally applicable principles, right across the board. My main point with all of my videos and literature is just really to say ‘hey everybody, this is a universally applicable principle (3 forces etc) I’ve given some examples (Pro Answers) and now I’ve set up a forum to flesh things out a bit.’

This is also why I’ve said in the past that I wish to share the experience fully, imagine trying to write an essay on exactly how Pro theory’s three simultaneous applies and works with literally everything. This would involve me writing about every single thing in every single time and place.

I’d have to write about every single word in every single language worldwide for starters. Every person in the world would need to be written about individually with an individual profile personalised and explained in every facet by Pro theory.In short me writing about every possible question and topic is physically impossible, I haven’t got the time nor the means to explain everything individually and so I explained the most pressing topics (Pro Answers) as an introduction in the hope that others would ask me more questions later on.

The easiest way to think of Pro theory is to think of the old saying ‘everything is made of atoms.’ Simple as that really. Growing up I was always fundamentally aware that my body and the air around me, the food that I ate were atoms at their lowest level.

This was long before Pro theory ever realised itself.So we look at atoms, we see electrons (negative), protons (positive) and neutrons (neutral).

We also see that when the neutron was originally discovered it was thought of as a composite particle, not as a distinct and separate entity as it’s now seen. In reality the neutron is composed of part proton and part electron, so to speak. When opposites meet in the middle we’ve got the neutron.This is scientific proven fact, everything is made of atoms.

This is not disputed in physics really, at least not in principle. The simple idea that all things in the universe are ‘made of’ atoms is not my idea but it’s the idea that led me to find Pro theory.Summing up as follows:

1. Everything in the universe is made of atoms (fact).

2. Atoms are made of protons (positive), electrons (negative), and neutrons (neutral).

3. If everything is literally made of atoms then everything must also literally possess the three atomic potentials.

If atoms create you and me, books, computers, emotions, thoughts, love, death, the moon, gravity etc then this means that it’s electrons (negative), protons (positive), and neutrons (neutral) that everything is made of.

Can you see this now? If you follow along it’s so simple :meditate:Atoms create everything, this is scientific fact > atoms contain three potentials therefore all their creations (life, love, the universe et al) must also contain these three potentials > just because an atomic creation is a computer, electricity, me, you, my car, a coffee mug, a physics textbook, the same fundamental fact remains > whatever it is we’re dealing with, any thing, and topic > atomic potential permeates in three ways.

If you can accept that everything is made of atoms, atoms have three potentials, and that everything therefore also has three potentials then you know as much as I ever will :yes:

Mr Scientist – ‘Re: Pro Theory – A Theory of Everything’

Right – found a massive flaw in your theory. You base this on the condition that animals do not have a choice, and you also seem to base consciousness as a particular phenomenon for only human animals (because let’s face it… that’s what we are).

Well, this is wrong; how can animals not have choices? Do you base this strange hypothesis on the level of intelligence perhaps, because pigs are found to be just as intelligent as a two-year old child, maybe older.

Dolphins, elephants and apes can all register and ”know” their own reflections – this shows a great level of recognition and intellect. You also say animals do not act upon without thinking.

This is certainly not true also. How did you surmise this strange thought? Does a dog not choose to sit down if you offer them a biscuit? Does a dog not actually ”think” about that biscuit in order to sit? I think you should have thought through this better.

Pro – ‘Re: Pro Theory – A Theory of Everything’

[quote=Mr Scientist;806]Right – found a massive flaw in your theory. You base this on the condition that animals do not have a choice, and you also seem to base consciousness as a particular phenomenon for only human animals (because let’s face it… that’s what we are).

Well, this is wrong; how can animals not have choices? Do you base this strange hypothesis on the level of intelligence perhaps, because pigs are found to be just as intelligent as a two-year old child, maybe older.

Dolphins, elephants and apes can all register and ”know” their own reflections – this shows a great level of recognition and intellect.You also say animals do not act upon without thinking. This is certainly not true also. How did you surmise this strange thought?

Does a dog not choose to sit down if you offer them a biscuit? Does a dog not actually ”think” about that biscuit in order to sit?I think you should have thought through this better.[/quote]

Hello, sorry it took me so long to reply to you. I wish to set the record straight here, my videos and ideas on consciousness are not reflective of my core theory whatsoever. These ideas on human and animal choices are my own interest, not strictly TOE related.My theory is as follows:

[quote]if you want to get really, really, really literal and technical about the TOE, everything has three simultaneous potentials plus the opposite plus neutral.Like it, or not, or neutral, this is how it is (but it also isn’t plus neutral). I apologise for my childish style of illustration here but to be understood Pro theory must be taken literally with no holds barred (plus the opposite plus neutral).

Whatever anybody says or states, I will ask them about the opposite and neutral potentials within their answer or statement, be it a TOE or otherwise.[/quote]By this logic I’m not stating any unchanging singularities, merely that all possible choices/outcomes/states have a theoretical opposite and middle (neutral) point also.

I would never actually say anything as a singularity without trying to account for all three potentials simultaneously.Have you read any of my other essays or my usual stock answers to people’s questions?

Tesla – ‘Re: Pro Theory – A Theory of Everything’

[quote=Pro;329]I’m going to post a few of my new videos in for you as I seem to become more confusing with every word I type :p[url=”http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GwpXjN4dlJg”%5DYouTube – TOE Pro Theory Thoughts 1[/url][/quote] OK, this is the first video I have watched so far.

You explained it perfectly, I understood it.A couple of things stood out for me I.e.; thinking child-like and most people won’t “Get it” because of it’s simplicity. But aren’t you just reiterating the simple idea that something is either off or on?

Plus or minus? I know you say positive, negative and neutral, but isn’t that the same? I guess what I mean isn’t neutral a combination of plus and minus? I mean what exactly IS neutral?Let me just add this.

My mental state right now is very negative. I wish I could neutralize it.The possibility of adding more positive thoughts doesn’t seem to be helping. I just keep snapping back to the negative and I hate it. Any suggestions as to how to change this aside from unconsciousness?

Tesla – ‘Re: Pro Theory – A Theory of Everything’

[quote=Mr Scientist;805]Let me be a barer of some harsh news. I am a physicist and I have studied many broad theories out there. Some of them are very good, but I tend to feel theories fail conceptually, mathematically and in every way consistently with the inexorable truth that full descriptions of the universe are incomprehensibly difficult to create due to a level of uncertainty.

I found you from a YOUTUBE site [url=”http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mP6nZsr_vqY”%5DYouTube – Theory Of Everything – On Understanding Consciousness #1[/url] , and I am about to sit down and see this theory of yours (which seems to involve consciousness?) – (I hope this is not going to be a solipsistic-natured theory) – they are purely cop-outs based on the theories of consciousness I have studied (which are vast).

First of all, there cannot be any true absolute theory of everything. Do you truly believe that the universe will allow us to reduce its complexities so easily?

I’m afraid too many variables and uncertainty exist for any true absolute model with both relativistic and quantum roots. And certainly if such a theory is plausible by even the most enigmatic conditions, the theory of quantum mechanics will undergo many changes yet before such a solution has presented itself.

Quantum mechanics is far too premature, and relativity far too incomplete to reconcile all these odds.[/quote]

I’m sorry but you said that in a repetitive thought process the electricity can’t get through. That puzzles me. I would have thought the opposite.

Pro – ‘Re: Pro Theory – A Theory of Everything’

[quote=Tesla;1031]OK, this is the first video I have watched so far. You explained it perfectly, I understood it.A couple of things stood out for me I.e.; thinking child-like and most people won’t “Get it” because of it’s simplicity.But aren’t you just reiterating the simple idea that something is either off or on?

Plus or minus? I know you say positive, negative and neutral, but isn’t that the same? I guess what I mean isn’t neutral a combination of plus and minus? I mean what exactly IS neutral?

Let me just add this. My mental state right now is very negative. I wish I could neutralize it. The possibility of adding more positive thoughts doesn’t seem to be helping.

I just keep snapping back to the negative and I hate it. Any suggestions as to how to change this aside from unconsciousness?[/quote]

I think the first thing about me not thinking I make sense is mostly me being paranoid.

I find it difficult to explain my ideas a lot of the time, simple as they are. As for your mental state, I’m not sure but exercise always helps, or doing something outside of your normal comfort zone perhaps.

Meditation is a good way to practice neutralising your thoughts but it may take a while. I hope you feel better soon 🙂

Tesla – ‘Re: Pro Theory – A Theory of Everything’

Good idea. That’ll fit right into my plan for the day. A nice, long walk around the lake. Getting out in Nature always neutralizes and refreshes me. Dealing with people all the time their negativity spreads.

Vonour – ‘Re: Pro Theory – A Theory of Everything’

Light=Dark Matter(Black Holes)Explained…Come and See: Black holes are solid (antimatter-quasiparticles) this is why a Black Hole emits two gamma rays jets..and moves faster than light(Dark matter)..Humans and everything solid or(phonons and polaritons)…Humans (solids)..move beyond the speed of light example…

Like when a fly is in your car and it begins to fly around it’s speed is not the same as the car. Yet it takes on the cars speed .. if it was to move out of the car it would be swept away by the wind which is also a (solid).. the same principle works within a galaxy…

Because the Universe expanded beyond the speed of light, Black holes are able to be solid and move beyond the speed of light giving birth to Solid Matter within the galaxy which in turn gave birth to humanity.. When apply this principle to LIGHT …light does not change in speed because the black holes move
.999999 times the velocity of light

..light must be bent to be seen from outside the galaxy but can be seen by us because light waves are bent within the galaxy by the Black Hole.. Because the Black holes are the driving force of a galaxy, the galaxy itself moves faster than light…that is why we see galaxies receding from us and yet the recessions would be faster as they get farther way from each other….

That is why once 2 galaxies move far enough away from each other the light waves will soon fade causing distant galaxies to seem to disappear…for the distance of travel between each other is to far for the light waves to reach both of them. Because they move faster than light.. Time for us has slowed to the formation of Solid matter..

Vonour – ‘Re: Pro Theory – A Theory of Everything’

…or are you to excited like I was when I realized it too.. that You are right..?…

Vonour – ‘Re: Pro Theory – A Theory of Everything’

…I have just now looked at some of your thoughts of the subject I am hoping you will understand .. my theory..

Vonour – ‘Re: Pro Theory – A Theory of Everything’

…the math is sound……I have try to explain it the best way I knew how..?

Vonour – ‘Re: Pro Theory – A Theory of Everything’

..I know the thought of only having 2 to 3 years of.. so called life left on this Earth is not the best thing to hear but you most realize .. (there are 2 of you in the Galaxy of ours… and You will not die .. you are an infinite eternal being.. and will only have to .. start all over again…

Vonour – ‘Re: Pro Theory – A Theory of Everything’

..think of it this way…You get to experience life forever .. its joy and sadness for with out joy .. there can be no sadness… and at least we can realize that..chances are you will awaken and think you merely experienced a dream…and will continue on like nothing ever happened…

Vonour – ‘Re: Pro Theory – A Theory of Everything’

..let me try again .. ? Do you think You are real…….?……you are trapped in time.. forever in an endless circle of reality . the next .. may just be the same .. for we are back in time.. at this very moment.

Vonour – ‘Re: Pro Theory – A Theory of Everything’

..lets see there are at least 2 of us in the vast Universe .. if you want to call it that.. at all time.. and a 3rd too .. but it could just be 3 at all time then.. like you mentioned.. I know you understand my theory I hope you know someone whom can .. confirm it for me would be nice… for it can not be a fact until someone at least confirms it.

.. but I do like your thought on the subject… Maybe this will help you out.. some .. after you see you are on the right track of understanding.. …

AdamMedici – ‘Re: Pro Theory – A Theory of Everything’

Vonour, the grip of reality that slips away at the discovery of the infinite effects those who find it in varied ways. Some simply do not understand, and it does not effect them in the least bit. Those that understand too much are tested by their own sanity.

It looks as though you are of the latter. I feel for your soul and the troubled storm that rages in your mind. Do not lose touch or hope my old friend/brother/self.

We are one and the same; as are all things of existence. Yes you have found me/us through the choices you’ve made, but do not confuse this with fate. Not everyone has the courage or intellect to reach out to where you have ventured.

Is your theory correct? Why does it matter what others say? Try and simplify your thoughts into a more understandable fashion. Choose an equation that is straight to the point and share it all. And we will listen. ~ Adam.

Vonour – ‘Re: Pro Theory – A Theory of Everything’

I am not concerned if I am right or not…I have always known through out my life … seeing things in a different light…It has been a test of understanding

.. in which has drove me to this point .. I did not have a choice in the matter…I since the age of 13 .. have been .. A 4 Horseman .. and has I have travelled through this time of reality I have been pushed into what I could not grasp.

Pro – ‘Re: Pro Theory – A Theory of Everything’

Hi Vonour welcome to the forum 🙂 You’ve written a lot of off topic stuff here, meaning non-Pro theory specific, so I’m going to move your posts into your own thread.

I will post the link to it when it’s done. I appreciate you sharing your thoughts but this is not quite the right thread. I’m just trying to keep things on topic.

Vonour – ‘Re: Pro Theory – A Theory of Everything’

Nichole .. Where are You .. … Much Love For You … … I miss Seeing You .. … I love you . .please forgive me for everything ..

If I have done you any wrong.. My Love is yours Forever and Ever …infinite…… I am Sorry … our life has been as it has …

My True Love …… I can hardly control my self when I am about you … I know why .. now .. I see .. You and Me .. where always ment to be … and they did this to Us for what purpose could they have … been so cruel … to the ones who Love …… Love is never Blind … what is to be shall always be …

My Love for The … stands the test of Time …

[Author]

Posts