The Big Bang

[ProKeymaster]

The Big Bang

Tina – ‘Re: The Big Bang’

I am not an advocate of the Big Bang Theory. Two particular reasons throw the theory into doubt for me. High red-shift has been observed in established blue-shift areas. As an advocate of Protheory nothing can exist without corresponding positive and negative potentials -thus there can be no singularity. I would appreciate your comments Pro as my grasp on singularity is limited.

soaralone1 – ‘Re: The Big Bang’

I have great difficulty in the theory of there being any one or many Big Bangs. All the work and continuing complex additional theories leave no room for Nature to be really very simple. Suppose there is another explanation for what is being viewed as “expansion” and “acceleration”? Further suppose there are two easily developed equations, one for apparent expansion and the other for the apparent acceleration? These equations would be a lot more convenient to use, wouldn’t they be?

Pro – ‘Re: The Big Bang’

Welcome back Tina, it’s great to have you back with us 😀 I’ve not seen any studies of high red shift being observed in blue shift areas but it doesn’t surprise me to be honest 😉 There should be a neutral colour shift as well somewhere, purple or maybe green according to some things I’ve read I think. It’s these opposite shifts of light that form the whole basis or Big Bang theory and so if we now know that there’s actually three potentials then we know the theory is not totally accurate.

It’s an interesting idea for sure but it’s not a TOE as it only gives us red and blue, no neutral shift. I also think it’s interesting to note that the colours are primary not secondary. As you know there are three primary colours, three secondary colours. Bit of a problem for Newton’s theory of the light spectrum but I’ve often wondered if he added an extra purple colour to the proceedings.

There’s indigo and also violet but there should only be three colours, three primary and three secondary in my opinion. Apparently indigo is the point between blue and violet so this is why it’s extra. If we thought of it as the neutral point between blue and violet we can see why it’s extra as all other colour transitions should also have a neutral point too. If we’ve got three colours, we’ve got three opposites (secondary colours) and we should also have three neutral points between each colour at the point of not being green or blue for example, but being a bit of both until we move further along the spectrum.

As it seems to stand we’ve got 7 colours defined when there should only really be three, three opposites, and three neutral points which makes 9, divided by 3 makes 3, 3 divided by 3 makes 1 singular. And that’s Po theory. It seems to me like Newton missed the other two neutral points between colours, much as he observed gravity as a force devoid of its opposite and neutral potentials. Also, if we think of the blue and red shifts we’re only observing the universe in opposite directions.

It’s as though we’re looking north and south only. If we added the secondary colours too we’d have north and south (moving towards or away) and also we’d have east and west (left and right). Just thought this was an interesting aside here. So basically the universe just flows, has always done, and will always do so. What we consider as unchangeable just means slowly changeable. The universe doesn’t take account of time or years I don’t think.

[Author]

Posts