P versus NP

This problem is about efficiency.

Problems of class P can be solved in a finite amount of time, and problems of class NP require an infinite amount of time to solve.

It seems to be theoretically possible to create some questions that would take us millions of years to solve using our current technology.

Imagine trying to calculate the amount of atoms in the universe.

Any answer requires an infinite amount of explanations, or at least an infinite amount of time to complete.

We need to know if there is a more efficient way to solve these problems, or if we are stuck with the method of eliminating all steps individually, which could take us an infinite amount of time.

The amount of possible combinations seems to be so large as to defy any direct attempts to solve the problem using our current technology.

Nobody has yet proven whether these tasks can actually exist, or whether they are illusory.

Do questions or tasks exist that could take us an infinite amount of time to solve?

Is there a formula or shortcut that will allow us to solve them in a finite amount of time?

The Millennium problem is to explain the nature of this kind of infinite problem and to prove whether or not they can actually exist.

For the exact problem description please refer to Claymath.org

The Answer

The P versus NP problem presents us with two options, either we can solve these questions in a finite amount of time or we cannot, and asks us to choose one of them.

We are dealing with opposite and neutral potentials, regardless of the specific details of each individual question.

All questions have three simultaneous answers.

All details are relative and subject to change in three ways simultaneously.

We are dealing with three possibilities at all relative times therefore we have three possible types of task or question.

1. Finite.

2. Infinite.

3. Neutral.

Simultaneously.

There is the possibility that each type of task may either exist, not exist, or nothing.

1. Some tasks require a finite amount of time to complete.

2. Some tasks require an infinite amount of time to complete.

3. Some tasks are neutral.

Simultaneously.

Am I wrong?

I simultaneously oppose, agree with, and neutralise all criticism ad infinitum.

There is no point creating a theory of everything that doesn’t work.