The Goldbach Conjecture

Every even number greater in size than 2 can be expressed as the sum of two primes.

This is one of the oldest unsolved problems in the field of mathematics and it concerns the patterns within prime numbers.

Prime numbers can only be evenly divided by themselves and 1.

2, 3, 5, 7…

The Goldbach Conjecture simply states that every even number greater in size than 2 can be expressed as the sum of two primes.

Computer searches have apparently verified this conjecture up to 400 trillion, but a definite and singular proof or disproof continues to evade us.

Every even number greater in size than 2 can be expressed as the sum of two primes.

Is this statement singularly provable?

Can every even number greater than 2 be expressed unchangingly as the sum of two primes?

The Answer

The answer to the Goldbach conjecture is that any singularly stated or singularly intended idea is missing its opposite and neutral potentials.

The idea of a statement that can never change is theoretically inaccurate.

Numbers are a human invention.

All numbers symbolise either one, more (or less) than one, or nothing (zero).

Any larger combination of numbers is simply the same original three potentials being infinitely repeated.

With regards to any patterns to be found within this repetition, there are three possible potentials governing any stated pattern, regardless of the specific details.

Every even number greater in size than two can be expressed as the sum of two primes but the opposite and neutral potential is still equally and simultaneously possible.

Is the Goldbach conjecture true or false?

1. The Goldbach conjecture is true.

2. The Goldbach conjecture is false.

3. The Goldbach conjecture is neutral.

Simultaneously.

Am I wrong?

I simultaneously oppose, agree with, and neutralise all criticism ad infinitum.

There is no point creating a theory of everything that doesn’t work.