Chaos Theory

According to the current laws of physics our universe should display infinite order but it also seems to display an inexplicable potential for randomness.

Chaos theory is the interpretation of apparently random events and patterns in any given process or observable sequence of events.

There seems to be a hidden and unpredictable chaos (randomness) principle in certain models and processes, even though there should not be according to the accepted laws of physics.

For some people chaos might mean the study of mathematical patterns with a tendency towards randomness.

For others it is the process of creating chaotic and complicated models through the repetition of simple starting conditions.

Probably the most famous example of this branch of chaos theory is the butterfly effect.

It’s like saying that if I blow some air out of my mouth, the same energy could theoretically multiply and create a freak weather condition in another part of the world.

Does the universe contain a hidden element of randomness?

Some things seem to display randomness when there should be infinite order.

How do we solve the problem of randomness within the universe?

The Answer

We quite reasonably expect that everything should be one of two possible opposites.

Left or right, true or false, up or down, this or that.

The list of possible examples is literally endless.

There are three simultaneous possibilities and potentials within everything, and not two unchanging opposites as we sometimes tend to assume.

Neutrality is not often held accountable as an actual force because it only exists relative to the two other forces (negative and positive).

Even if we account for two opposites there is still neutrality.

The presence of neutrality causes all things to possess the potential for randomness.

We will never be able to singularly predict or prove any idea as an unchanging constant because there will always be an opposite and neutral potential.

It is the neutral potential that is important here with regards to a complete understanding of every possible action or occurrence.

To solve the problem we need to add a third option to account for the fact that the universe, and therefore everything within it, contains three simultaneous potentials and not just two opposites.
Can we explain randomness within the universe?

1. We can explain the potential for randomness within the universe.

2. We cannot explain the potential for randomness within the universe.

3. There is a neutral possibility.

Simultaneously.

Am I wrong?

I simultaneously oppose, agree with, and neutralise all criticism ad infinitum.

There is no point creating a theory of everything that doesn’t work.