String Theory

This theory describes the universe as an infinite collection of vibrating loops known as strings.

All universal forces and interactions are thought to be a result of these vibrations within all matter.

String theory is an attempt at a theory of everything.

It basically states that everything in the universe is made of tiny vibrating strings.

The main assumption of this theory is that strings may be infinitely large or small and it is suggested that they create the universe and everything (all interactions) within it.

One particular object might be described as a string vibrating one way, and another object might be described as a string vibrating another way.

The concept of these vibrating loops is thought to account for the basic principle of change that the universe exhibits, the inherent potential found within all matter.

String theory suggests that if it were somehow possible to infinitely magnify the particles and forces that we currently observe, we would find that they are composed of one dimensional vibrating loops.

Combinations of these strings are thought to overlap each other and this process is thought to create the theoretical potential for loops in time and space.

String theory describes many (possibly infinite) dimensions.

Everything is made of infinitely large or small strings.

Strings may overlap each other.

All interactions between matter are thought to be explained as strings vibrating.

Is string theory accurate as a theory of everything?

The Answer

String theory makes a number of relative assumptions that cannot be ultimately relied upon as unchanging constants.

The theory itself relies on the shape of a “string” for example, which is too specific to be a complete description of the potentials within the universe as it is singular.

This singular description doesn’t account for the opposite and neutral potentials within itself and it is therefore not completely accurate.

To be able to see these strings it is assumed that we need some sort of new and powerful technology, capable of infinite magnification.

A theory of everything should not need to assume anything further than the relative existence of its own self.

A theory of everything should not need to rely on a deeper explanatory base, or need to project some sort of “shape” or other relative definition upon the universe in order to explain and understand it truthfully.

Everything is a simultaneous loop of three possible potentials beyond description by words.
Is String theory a theory of everything?

1. String theory is a theory of everything.

2. String theory is not a theory of everything.

3. There is a neutral possibility.

Simultaneously.

Am I wrong?

I simultaneously oppose, agree with, and neutralise all criticism ad infinitum.

There is no point creating a theory of everything that doesn’t work.