The Theory of Relativity

There are two versions of this theory that attempt to describe the interactions between space, time, and energy, especially for two different objects moving in different ways, or different frames of relative reference.

Relativity is the famous idea created by Albert Einstein during the early twentieth century.

There are two versions of the theory of relativity.

1. Special Relativity (1905).

2. General Relativity (1915).

I will outline the implications of the whole theory in general as it is currently understood and studied.

The speed of light is assumed to be the same for all observers, no matter how they happen to be moving at any relative moment of observation.

The accepted laws of physics are unchanging in every observable inertial (accelerated) frame of reference, and all these frames are assumed to be equivalent.

No object can achieve a speed that is faster than that of light.

Two seemingly simultaneous events within a singular point of reference may not appear to be simultaneous from a different point of reference.

This basically implies that everything is relative to where you happen to be observing it from.

It also introduces the speed of light as an absolute and unchangingly constant property of the universe.

Is the speed of light a fundamental and unchanging constant?

Are the laws of physics unchangingly the same for all observers?

Is the theory of relativity unchangingly constant?

Is the theory of relativity accurate as a complete description of everything?

The Answer

The theory of relativity relies on unchanging constants such as the speed of light.

The use of unchanging rules (especially if singular) cannot be considered as completely accurate because this implies an unchanging constant.

Relative observations that rely on unchanging principles, such as a singular outcome or law, are missing their opposite potentials.

All energy contains three possible potentials of formation and change, relatively speaking or otherwise.

The assumption that the speed of light cannot change is singular and therefore inaccurate.

The speed of light may be the fastest speed that we have currently observed but assuming that it is singular and unchanging doesn’t work.

I can easily state the opposite potentials which disproves as singular (loops) the original assumption.

We need to account for this inherent randomness within the universe in order to fully explain the process of energy changing.

Three answers is the most accurate way to account for every possible answer to or formation of everything because “everything” possesses the possibility for three simultaneous potentials at any singular moment in time.

Is relativity accurate as a description of the universe?

1. Relativity is accurate as a description of the universe.

2. Relativity is not accurate as a description of the universe.

3. There is a neutral possibility.

Simultaneously.

Am I wrong?

I simultaneously oppose, agree with, and neutralise all criticism ad infinitum.

There is no point creating a theory of everything that doesn’t work.